A wide variety of NLP applications, such as machine translation, summarization, and dialog, involve text generation. One major challenge for these applications is how to evaluate whether such generated texts are actually fluent, accurate, or effective. In this work, we conceptualize the evaluation of generated text as a text generation problem, modeled using pre-trained sequence-to-sequence models. The general idea is that models trained to convert the generated text to/from a reference output or the source text will achieve higher scores when the generated text is better. We operationalize this idea using BART, an encoder-decoder based pre-trained model, and propose a metric BARTScore with a number of variants that can be flexibly applied in an unsupervised fashion to evaluation of text from different perspectives (e.g.

However, deliberative forums such as citizens' assemblies have shown promise in bypassing party polarization and fostering productive discussions on contentious political issues [3]. Unfortunately, most deliberations do not take place in carefully structured settings with nationally representative participants. Instead, they often occur within homogeneous groups [17]. When this happens, deliberation can lead to group polarization, where individuals become more extreme in their initial positions rather than engaging with opposing viewpoints [22]. This can be problematic if the goal of deliberation is to build common ground and consensus within a pluralistic electorate. Given that large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated some fidelity in accurately responding to opinion surveys [1, 20] and adopting different personas [12], we explore whether an LLM-powered tool can help introduce missing perspectives in group deliberation.

A wide variety of NLP applications, such as machine translation, summarization, and dialog, involve text generation. One major challenge for these applications is how to evaluate whether such generated texts are actually fluent, accurate, or effective. In this work, we conceptualize the evaluation of generated text as a text generation problem, modeled using pre-trained sequence-to-sequence models. The general idea is that models trained to convert the generated text to/from a reference output or the source text will achieve higher scores when the generated text is better. We operationalize this idea using BART, an encoder-decoder based pre-trained model, and propose a metric BARTScore with a number of variants that can be flexibly applied in an unsupervised fashion to evaluation of text from different perspectives (e.g.

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of natural language processing, enabling remarkable progress in various tasks. Different from objective tasks such as commonsense reasoning and arithmetic question-answering, the performance of LLMs on subjective tasks is still limited, where the perspective on the specific problem plays crucial roles for better interpreting the context and giving proper response. For example, in certain scenarios, LLMs may perform better when answering from an expert role perspective, potentially eliciting their relevant domain knowledge. In contrast, in some scenarios, LLMs may provide more accurate responses when answering from a third-person standpoint, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of the problem and potentially mitigating inherent biases. In this paper, we propose Reasoning through Perspective Transition (RPT), a method based on in-context learning that enables LLMs to dynamically select among direct, role, and third-person perspectives for the best way to solve corresponding subjective problem. Through extensive experiments on totally 12 subjective tasks by using both closed-source and open-source LLMs including GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Llama-3, and Qwen-2, our method outperforms widely used single fixed perspective based methods such as chain-of-thought prompting and expert prompting, highlights the intricate ways that LLMs can adapt their perspectives to provide nuanced and contextually appropriate responses for different problems.

Complex problem-solving requires cognitive flexibility--the capacity to entertain multiple perspectives while preserving their distinctiveness. This flexibility replicates the "wisdom of crowds" within a single individual, allowing them to "think with many minds." While mental simulation enables imagined deliberation, cognitive constraints limit its effectiveness. We propose synthetic deliberation, a Large Language Model (LLM)-based method that simulates discourse between agents embodying diverse perspectives, as a solution. Using a custom GPT-based model, we showcase its benefits: concurrent processing of multiple viewpoints without cognitive degradation, parallel exploration of perspectives, and precise control over viewpoint synthesis. By externalizing the deliberative process and distributing cognitive labor between parallel search and integration, synthetic deliberation transcends mental simulation's limitations. This approach shows promise for strategic planning, policymaking, and conflict resolution.

Textual personality detection aims to identify personality traits by analyzing user-generated content. To achieve this effectively, it is essential to thoroughly examine user-generated content from various perspectives. However, previous studies have struggled with automatically extracting and effectively integrating information from multiple perspectives, thereby limiting their performance on personality detection. To address these challenges, we propose the Multi-view Mixture-of-Experts Model for Textual Personality Detection (MvP). MvP introduces a Multi-view Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) network to automatically analyze user posts from various perspectives. Additionally, it employs User Consistency Regularization to mitigate conflicts among different perspectives and learn a multi-view generic user representation. The model's training is optimized via a multi-task joint learning strategy that balances supervised personality detection with self-supervised user consistency constraints. Experimental results on two widely-used personality detection datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the MvP model and the benefits of automatically analyzing user posts from diverse perspectives for textual personality detection.

The task of Information Retrieval (IR) requires a system to identify relevant documents based on users' information needs. In real-world scenarios, retrievers are expected to not only rely on the semantic relevance between the documents and the queries but also recognize the nuanced intents or perspectives behind a user query. For example, when asked to verify a claim, a retrieval system is expected to identify evidence from both supporting vs. contradicting perspectives, for the downstream system to make a fair judgment call. In this work, we study whether retrievers can recognize and respond to different perspectives of the queries -- beyond finding relevant documents for a claim, can retrievers distinguish supporting vs. opposing documents? We reform and extend six existing tasks to create a benchmark for retrieval, where we have diverse perspectives described in free-form text, besides root, neutral queries. We show that current retrievers covered in our experiments have limited awareness of subtly different perspectives in queries and can also be biased toward certain perspectives. Motivated by the observation, we further explore the potential to leverage geometric features of retriever representation space to improve the perspective awareness of retrievers in a zero-shot manner. We demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our projection-based methods on the same set of tasks. Further analysis also shows how perspective awareness improves performance on various downstream tasks, with 4.2% higher accuracy on AmbigQA and 29.9% more correlation with designated viewpoints on essay writing, compared to non-perspective-aware baselines.

Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable ability in textual generation. However, in complex reasoning tasks such as code generation, generating the correct answer in a single attempt remains a formidable challenge for LLMs. Previous research has explored solutions by aggregating multiple outputs, leveraging the consistency among them. However, none of them have comprehensively captured this consistency from different perspectives. In this paper, we propose the Multi-Perspective Self-Consistency (MPSC) framework, a novel decoding strategy for LLM that incorporates both inter-consistency across outputs from multiple perspectives and intra-consistency within a single perspective. Specifically, we ask LLMs to sample multiple diverse outputs from various perspectives for a given query and then construct a multipartite graph based on them. With two predefined measures of consistency, we embed both inter- and intra-consistency information into the graph. The optimal choice is then determined based on consistency analysis in the graph. We conduct comprehensive evaluation on the code generation task by introducing solution, specification and test case as three perspectives. We leverage a code interpreter to quantitatively measure the inter-consistency and propose several intra-consistency measure functions. Our MPSC framework significantly boosts the performance on various popular benchmarks, including HumanEval (+17.60%), HumanEval Plus (+17.61%), MBPP (+6.50%) and CodeContests (+11.82%) in Pass@1, when compared to original outputs generated from ChatGPT, and even surpassing GPT-4.

Scientific machine reading comprehension (SMRC) aims to understand scientific texts through interactions with humans by given questions. As far as we know, there is only one dataset focused on exploring full-text scientific machine reading comprehension. However, the dataset has ignored the fact that different readers may have different levels of understanding of the text, and only includes single-perspective question-answer pairs, leading to a lack of consideration of different perspectives. To tackle the above problem, we propose a novel multi-perspective SMRC dataset, called SciMRC, which includes perspectives from beginners, students and experts. Our proposed SciMRC is constructed from 741 scientific papers and 6,057 question-answer pairs. Each perspective of beginners, students and experts contains 3,306, 1,800 and 951 QA pairs, respectively. The extensive experiments on SciMRC by utilizing pre-trained models suggest the importance of considering perspectives of SMRC, and demonstrate its challenging nature for machine comprehension.

Faria et al. [faria2017iros, faria21roman] expanded to multi-party scenarios the impact of legibility in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). In faria2017iros, the authors explore the impact of applying legible motions in multi-party scenarios. The authors present a user study with a robot serving cups of water to groups of three human partners, who do not know the order through which the robot is going to serve them. The results of the study, show that using only efficient movements led to worst collaboration between the humans and the robot, than when the robot uses legible movements. When the robot focus only on using efficient movements, the humans interacting with the robot would even sometimes get confused regarding who the robot was going to serve and would get in the way of each other.